Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 1 de 1
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 103(6): 873-884, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38558510

BACKGROUND: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) are utilized for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD) significance. We aimed to analyze their concordance and prognostic impact. AIMS: We aimed to analyze the concordance between QFR and MPS and their risk stratification. METHODS: Patients with invasive coronary angiography and MPS were categorized as concordant if QFR ≤ 0.80 and summed difference score (SDS) ≥ 4 or if QFR > 0.80 and SDS < 4; otherwise, they were discordant. Concordance was classified by coronary territory involvement: total (three territories), partial (two territories), poor (one territory), and total discordance (zero territories). Leaman score assessed coronary atherosclerotic burden. RESULTS: 2010 coronary territories (670 patients) underwent joint QFR and MPS analysis. MPS area under the curve for QFR ≤ 0.80 was 0.637. Concordance rates were total (52.5%), partial (29.1%), poor (15.8%), and total discordance (2.6%). Most concordance occurred in patients without significant CAD or with single-vessel disease (89.5%), particularly without MPS perfusion defects (91.5%). Leaman score (odds ratio [OR]: 0.839, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.805-0.875, p < 0.001) and MPS perfusion defect (summed stress score [SSS] ≥ 4) (OR: 0.355, 95% CI: 0.211-0.596, p < 0.001) were independent predictors for discordance. After 1400 days, no significant difference in death/myocardial infarction was observed based on MPS assessment, but Leaman score, functional Leaman score, and average QFR identified higher risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: MPS showed good overall accuracy in assessing QFR significance but substantial discordance existed. Predictors for discordance included higher atherosclerotic burden and MPS perfusion defects (SSS ≥ 4). Leaman score, QFR-based functional Leaman score, and average QFR provided better risk stratification for all-cause death and myocardial infarction than MPS.


Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Vessels , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , Predictive Value of Tests , Humans , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Female , Male , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Middle Aged , Aged , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Reproducibility of Results , Coronary Circulation , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Time Factors
...